![]() Paradox's DLC policy allows them to introduce support for a game years after release. ![]() He just stated he did not like Paradox's DLC policy. OP did not state he did not like the game. ![]() And equally no one is required to listen. Everyone is free to like or dislike a game and its current state of development. Originally posted by Cryten:This has really gotten off topic and into totally useless bickering. They just pump out trash on top of the base trash they release.īecause paying devs for their time is bad. Half the DLCs have a mixed or worse rating. On any Paradox DLC fest game - Cities, CK2, the other space game I never purchased. I'm sure Paradox wanted this pushed out to milk it and start lining their pockets. Just scrolling through the pages that have posted since I originally posted, they are mostly complaints - bugs, crashes, game won't start. Yes, I own several Paradox controlled games, but many were purchased before Paradox got their greedy hands on the rights and are now riding on the heels of great games and developers that are still selling years later - without DLC. I absolutely hate Paradox's practices and haven't purchased from their Dev's in years. Then a year or two down the road get a major expansion. Originally posted by Nick:I would gladly return to the days where I could buy a (complete) and functional game that might need a patch or two after release.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |